eBikes Spring 2026

eBike Tests

  • Test Report: AIMA’s New Key West Delivers Power and Good Value in a Stylish Urban eBike

  • Test Report: Rocky Mountain Instinct Powerplay SL Carbon 70 Outperforms as a Top Trail eMTB

  • Test Report: Cikada’s Touring eBike is a Solid Performer in All Kinds of Terrain and Conditions

  • Test Report: Giant’s Defy Advanced E+ Elite 1 Offers Smooth Performance in Comfort & Style

eBikes 2026

  • Specialized S-Works Turbo Levo 4 LTD

  • Devinci E-Spartan Lite GX AXS 12s

  • Trek Checkpoint+ SL 7 AXS

eAdventures

California Advances Bill SB 1167 for Legal eBikes vs eMotos and Halts AB 1942 and AB 1557

by Benjamin Sadavoy

(Sacramento, CA) California is successfully fighting back in the battle for legal e-bikes vs e-motos as Sen. Catherine S. Blakespear’s (D-Encinitas) Bill SB 1167, introduced in February, has advanced through the Transportation, Natural Resources, and Appropriations Committees, and is now awaiting a vote from the full Senate.

California is successfully fighting back in the battle for legal e-bikes vs e-motos. © Calbike

“Increasingly, higher-powered electric motorcycles, commonly called ‘e-motos,’ are being marketed and sold as ‘e-bikes,’ creating confusion for families and regulators, as well as causing new safety risks on public streets,” stated Blakespear. “Bill SB 1167 strengthens consumer protections, clarifies the classifications of certain high-powered electric devices, and cracks down on deceptive marketing, making it illegal to advertise or sell electric motorcycles, mopeds, or other higher-powered vehicles as electric bicycles.”

Bill SB 1167 also requires clear disclosure when a vehicle does not meet the e-bike definition and is subject to registration, licensing, helmet, and insurance requirements.

The bill is being touted as a template for other states and is co-sponsored by CalBike, PeopleForBikes, Streets For All, and Streets Are For Everyone.

Meanwhile, two other bills AB 1557 and AB 1942, introduced by Diane Papan (Assemblymember 21) and Rebecca Bauer-Kahan (Assemblymember 16) respectively, did not advance.

AB 1557 sought, among other restrictions, to impose a 250-watt motor cap on Class 1 and 2 e-bikes, effectively banning hub-drive e-bikes while AB 1942, the E-Bike Accountability Act, proposed treating e-bikes like cars, requiring mandatory DMV registration and license plates for Class 2 and Class 3 e-bikes.

“Huge news out of Sacramento today. AB 1557 and AB 1942 — two bills that would have decimated California’s legal e-bike industry — are dead in the Appropriations Committee,” wrote Brett Thurber, co-owner of the New Wheel, on LinkedIn. “To everyone who called, emailed, went to Sacramento, and stood up to be counted: you did this. Lawmakers count the people who show up, and you showed up.”

Pundits also noted that neither AB 1557 and AB 1942 addressed the illegal e-motos falsely marketed as e-bikes, which ultimately led to New Jersey Governor, Phil Murphy, signing a controversial new e-bike bill S4834/A6235 into law on Jan. 19, the day before he left office. That state now has the strictest regulations for electric bikes in the USA – read more here – with PeopleforBikes and others rallying to amend the legislation here.

“E-motos falsely sold as e-bikes are a real problem on our streets and we need to work to get this problem dealt with. This win is a reminder of what’s possible when riders, advocates, retailers, and manufacturers organize together and tell the true story: legal e-bikes are one of the best things happening for our health, our communities, and our planet,” added Thurber.

According to Calbike, “E-bikes are not the source of California’s traffic violence crisis. They are one of the exits from it. They give people a way to make short trips without climbing into a two-ton vehicle. They offer a cleaner, cheaper, more humane form of transportation. They are not a fringe gadget. They are one of the most practical tools we have to reduce car dependence.” – read more here.

Got Something To Say?